<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for &#039;thedunnthing&#039; - Aaron Dunn&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedunnthing.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedunnthing.com</link>
	<description>My views and strategies regarding Self Managed Super Funds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final ruling provides good news for SMSF property investing using borrowing by SMSFCoach - Liam Shorte</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2012/05/25/final-ruling-provides-good-news-for-smsf-property-investing-using-borrowing/#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SMSFCoach - Liam Shorte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=3419#comment-2057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good summary Aaron and great to see a common sense approach from the ATO that protects those looking for a sound investment within the more clearly defined parameters. This will help ensure that LRBA strategies may have a long lifespan as it will be harder for those who push the boundaries and go too far to mess it up for the majority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary Aaron and great to see a common sense approach from the ATO that protects those looking for a sound investment within the more clearly defined parameters. This will help ensure that LRBA strategies may have a long lifespan as it will be harder for those who push the boundaries and go too far to mess it up for the majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5 key reasons why you must always have a reversionary pension by Frank</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2010/09/19/5-key-reasons-why-you-must-always-have-a-reversionary-pension/#comment-2055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=1216#comment-2055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may be a basic question, but it is my understanding that a reversionary pension is a pre-existing pension payable to a dependant and this reversionary beneficiary must be nominated at the time of creation of the original pension. Under which section of SIS Act (or Reg) are your require to do this? Where does it say that the reversionary beneficiary most be nominated with the creation of the pension. As far as I know section 59 SIS Act is only applicable to BDBN. Greg blog Aaron, great discussions!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a basic question, but it is my understanding that a reversionary pension is a pre-existing pension payable to a dependant and this reversionary beneficiary must be nominated at the time of creation of the original pension. Under which section of SIS Act (or Reg) are your require to do this? Where does it say that the reversionary beneficiary most be nominated with the creation of the pension. As far as I know section 59 SIS Act is only applicable to BDBN. Greg blog Aaron, great discussions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Changing landscape when dealing with excess contributions? by Geoff</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2012/05/22/changing-landscape-when-dealing-with-excess-contributions/#comment-2051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=3411#comment-2051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the reason for the non-concessional bring forward rule being only applicable to under 65&#039;s?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the reason for the non-concessional bring forward rule being only applicable to under 65&#8242;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Budget delivers a fix for now but problems for the future by thedunnthing</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2012/05/09/budget-delivers-a-fix-for-now-but-problems-for-the-future/#comment-2039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thedunnthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 10:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=3376#comment-2039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kate,

I believe this is how it would apply as well, however we will only know for sure once we have draft regulations to review.  

Regards,
Aaron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kate,</p>
<p>I believe this is how it would apply as well, however we will only know for sure once we have draft regulations to review.  </p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Budget delivers a fix for now but problems for the future by Kate</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2012/05/09/budget-delivers-a-fix-for-now-but-problems-for-the-future/#comment-2034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 06:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=3376#comment-2034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Aaron,

In relation to the introduction of the 30% tax rate for those with an income over $300,000, how will this impact on the rate of taxation applied to concessional contributions allocated per ATO ID 2012/16?

That is, assuming a member makes a second concessional contribution in June 2012 of $25,000 (allocated in early July 2012) this will effectively bringing forward their deduction and subsequently the inclusion of the contribution in the Fund’s assessable income. As the contribution will be taxed in the year received (2012FY) rather than the year allocated (2013FY) will this contribution be taxed at the usual 15% or will the effect of the new rate of 30% somehow be applied? As the rates are only effective from 1 July 2012, perhaps there is a benefit to utilising this strategy and contributing before June rather than waiting until July? Too good to be true I’m guessing.

Thank you,

Kate]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,</p>
<p>In relation to the introduction of the 30% tax rate for those with an income over $300,000, how will this impact on the rate of taxation applied to concessional contributions allocated per ATO ID 2012/16?</p>
<p>That is, assuming a member makes a second concessional contribution in June 2012 of $25,000 (allocated in early July 2012) this will effectively bringing forward their deduction and subsequently the inclusion of the contribution in the Fund’s assessable income. As the contribution will be taxed in the year received (2012FY) rather than the year allocated (2013FY) will this contribution be taxed at the usual 15% or will the effect of the new rate of 30% somehow be applied? As the rates are only effective from 1 July 2012, perhaps there is a benefit to utilising this strategy and contributing before June rather than waiting until July? Too good to be true I’m guessing.</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Kate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMSF borrowing &#8211; which Bank? why not BYO? by thedunnthing</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2010/01/26/smsf-borrowing-which-bank-why-not-byo/#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thedunnthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 04:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=396#comment-2021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI Anna,

Most of the major banks have very competitive SMSF loan products.  The only difference is how they package them complying structure, some banks pre-package, some require you to setup and they then review.

Regards,
Aaron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Anna,</p>
<p>Most of the major banks have very competitive SMSF loan products.  The only difference is how they package them complying structure, some banks pre-package, some require you to setup and they then review.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMSF borrowing &#8211; which Bank? why not BYO? by Anna La</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2010/01/26/smsf-borrowing-which-bank-why-not-byo/#comment-2020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna La]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=396#comment-2020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which lender has  the best rate to borrow for SMSF properties investment ?   I live in NSW . 
TA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which lender has  the best rate to borrow for SMSF properties investment ?   I live in NSW .<br />
TA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transferring assets into an SMSF by thedunnthing</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2010/03/09/transferring-assets-into-an-smsf/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thedunnthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=279#comment-2013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tony,

Yes you can.  The transaction must obviously be done on an arm&#039;s length basis using a market valuation for the sale.

Regards,
Aaron]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony,</p>
<p>Yes you can.  The transaction must obviously be done on an arm&#8217;s length basis using a market valuation for the sale.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Aaron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Transferring assets into an SMSF by Tony</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2010/03/09/transferring-assets-into-an-smsf/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 07:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=279#comment-2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to do the reverse. i.e. Sell Residential property from the Superannuation Fund to a member or Family trust. Obviously a market valuation would be required to determing the selling price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to do the reverse. i.e. Sell Residential property from the Superannuation Fund to a member or Family trust. Obviously a market valuation would be required to determing the selling price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No need to raid the super fund piggy bank as Government announces further extension of reduced minimum pensions by thedunnthing</title>
		<link>http://thedunnthing.com/2011/11/29/no-need-to-raid-the-super-fund-piggy-bank-as-government-announces-further-extension-of-reduced-minimum-pensions/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thedunnthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 06:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedunnthing.com/?p=2807#comment-2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update Barry, it didn&#039;t make any sense to announce in the MYEFO and then backflip so quickly...  Although, it wasn&#039;t beyond the realms of possibility with their Labor Party&#039;s current record on policy decisions!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update Barry, it didn&#8217;t make any sense to announce in the MYEFO and then backflip so quickly&#8230;  Although, it wasn&#8217;t beyond the realms of possibility with their Labor Party&#8217;s current record on policy decisions!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

