SMSF Year End Planning Webinar

As we approach the end of the financial year, it is important to focus on the various planning opportunities that are available for members of self-managed super funds.  As both trustees and the broader SMSF industry place a greater focus on the quality advice, being able to effectively deliver strategies in the lead up to 30 June is crucial.

In this session, I will be exploring various contribution and pension strategies leading up to 30 June, along with a range of investment and estate planning considerations that are vital as part of your clients year-end and ongoing planning.

FIND OUT MORE AND REGISTER HERE

Having your SMSF capitalise on a market recovery

The last month or so has seen the ASX recover strongly after a disastrous start to the new financial year.  Whilst we are well short of the ASX highs of mid-2007, we may start to see some further gains with some hopeful news emerging from Europe and other parts of the world.

As a result of this recent positive change, it is important from a strategic point of view, to start thinking about some of the key strategies that will bolster you or your client’s superannuation savings in a market recovery:

1. Boost the 10% pension limit with a Transition to Retirement ‘reboot’ – an effectively implemented transition to retirement strategy can add tens of thousands of dollars to a member’s retirement savings.  For some clients who regularly take a 10% maximum pension, recovering markets can provide the ability to roll back the existing income stream and reset the pension with a higher balance.  Conversely, if clients are looking to take the smallest pension possible, especially in light of the 25% reduced minimum for the 2011/12 financial year, now may be an opportune time to roll back their pension to accumulation to reduce the amount required to be taken for the financial year.

2. Locking in tax-free proportions – the use of recontribution strategies is still one of the most effective tools to build greater tax efficiency into income streams under age 60 and also for estate planning purposes.  The creation of multiple pensions with additional contributions or recontributions allows a member to potentially benefit from a higher tax-free proportion when drawing an income stream from the fund.  Subject to the level of pension taken each financial year, you can continue to grow the higher tax-free super balance when markets rebound.

In poor markets, there is some significant tax savings that can be obtained by rolling back pensions to accumulation phase (full commutation) to ‘absorb’ the negative returns against the member’s taxable component, rather than proportionately against their tax-free and taxable components.  At an appropriate time in response to recovering markets, the ability to recommence the pension allows for the member to lock in a higher tax-free component, saving tax on pensions taken prior to 60 and providing long-term benefits for non-dependant beneficiaries.

3. Have you considered segregation? – to further benefit the use of multiple pensions, trustees have the ability to segregate specific assets to different members, pools of members or different superannuation interests.  For example, by applying the fund’s growth assets to a member’s super interest with a 100% tax-free proportion, it can potentially:

  • accelerate the grow of the account balance;
  • provide a greater pension amount that can be withdrawn under a transition to retirement income stream; and
  • decrease the fund’s potential future exposure to death benefits tax for non-dependants.

Segregation may also be useful where the fund is not 100% in pension phase (i.e. one member in accumulation, one in pension).  It could be used to assist in the realisation of a particular asset which has risen significantly off a low cost-base.  By applying segregation, the particular asset(s) with a significant capital gain is fully exempt from tax, rather than partially exempt by having an unsegregated fund.  It is important that any segregation strategy is appropriately documented by the trustees to show specific assets being applied to a particular member, interest or pool of members.

4. Time to build reserves? -  Reserves within a self-managed super fund can play an important current day and longer term estate planning role.  For the majority of SMSFs, you typically see any positive returns applied towards each member’s balance.  However, it is important to consider whether to capture some of these positive earnings into fund reserves to look at implementing a range of strategies including future anti-detriment payments, self-insuring members, enabling future crediting of 100% tax-free pensions, etc.

Fund Reserves can play an integral role in any SMSF and are typically generated by earnings over time.  Planning to capitalise on recovering markets allows for SMSFs to implement many of these reserving strategies effectively.

These are just some strategies that you can start to plan with your clients to help bolster your client’s superannuation savings in recovering markets.

SMSFs continue to grow

The SMSF sector continues to grow with no signs of slowing down.

The Australian Taxation Office has released their June 2011 quarterly statistics regarding Self-Managed Super Funds.  These statistics highlight the growing interest by individuals and professionals towards the SMSF industry.

I have outlined below some of the key highlights and analysis from the June 2011 statistics:

  • Net establishments for the June 2011 quarter were 7,402 (7,466 establishments with 64 wind ups), taking the total number of SMSFs to 456,472.
  • The 2010/11 financial reflected net establishments of 32,619 (33,106 establishments with 487 wind ups).  This represents at 37% increase in the number of SMSFs established compared to 2009/10 financial year (net of wind ups).  The number of new SMSFs established for the financial year is the highest since the ‘one-off’ $1m contribution opportunity in 2007.
  • It is interesting to note the significant drop in wind ups of SMSFs. Year-on-year the number of wind ups has been in-excess of 4,000 (up to 7,000 in June 2009).  With only 487 SMSFs wound up for the 2011 financial year, has the rationalisation of SMSFs that are not appropriate for certain individuals now finished (i.e. are current & new trustees better informed than ever before about an SMSF being appropriate for them?)
  • The average SMSF balance is now $916,746, down from the previous quarter average of $926,196.
  • There has been a $3.284 billion increase in cash and deposits for the quarter, representing 27.28% of fund assets to 30 June 2011.  However, this total fund assets within SMSFs have been “whittled away” by the decrease in listed shares (down $3.653 billion for the quarter).  Shares still however lead the way as the largest single asset class (33.30%).
  • The annual statistics (year-on-year) show that High Net Worth SMSFs (balances > $1m) appear have moved back into the share market, with an increase in exposure to listed shares of between 3.26% ($1 – $2m) to 5.33% ($10m+) (NB.  based on annualised statistics only available to 2010.)
  • The statistical breakdown by fund size is showing a significant increase in the number of $1m+ SMSFs.  During the 2010 financial year, 16,360 SMSFs moved into the magical million dollars of fund assets.  By contrast, the number of SMSFs under $200,000 is reducing, with 24.2% of funds now with balances under this figure.  The biggest drops have been in the under $50k and $50-$100k ranges.
  • The strongest growth in SMSF establishments continues to be in the accumulators, with the 45-54 age bracket representing 29.9% of funds established for the quarter and the 35-44 age bracket with 22.7%.
These statistics continue to show strong support in the use of Self-Managed Super Funds as a retirement savings vehicle.  Whilst reductions in concessional contribution caps have stymied the assets available to get into superannuation, it hasn’t reduced the appetite for SMSFs.

Are we making a mountain out of a SMSF collectables mole hill?

There has been a significant amount of discussion and debate in recent times about the draft regulations introduced for collectable investments within SMSFs to take effect from 1 July 2011.

In more recent times, I have been reading about the concerns of increased costs as a result of changes to collectables being held within SMSFs.  How quickly these people forget that the Cooper Panel recommendation was to prohibit the acquisition of collectables and personal use assets.

As part of building “integrity” into the self-managed super fund sector and breaking the shackles of past stigmas, changes to the ability to hold collectibles represents a positive step forward for the industry.  Where collectables and personal use assets represent 0.1% of a $430 billion industry, you would think the level of press on these matters meant more than a quarter of all SMSFs were invested in collectables!!!

Whilst concerns of additional compliance costs are valid, they are the reality of the future of SMSFs when it comes to improving the system’s integrity.  This is not an area being singled out by the Stronger Super reforms; take for the example the proposed future prohibition of acquiring shares from related parties.  The inability to transfer shares in-specie to a SMSF will become a more costly exercise as well.  This area is far more prevalent than collectables, yet little has been raised around these proposed changes?

So why are we where we are on this issue of collectables? I refer you back to the “Ten Guiding Principles for SMSFs” developed by the Cooper Review Panel, designed to underpin the regulation of SMSF specifically and more broadly for future policy-making in the SMSF sector.

The recognition of special risks in a SMSF environment (principle 7) and requiring some levels of intervention means that trustees (and their advisers) will need to change how they operate in a new SMSF landscape.  These changes are there to uphold strength in retirement policy but where it provides freedom of choice and greater control in making decisions over someone’s own retirement.

The industry has a right to have input in the future direction of superannuation policy within Australia, but I think arguing the toss on collectables is really making a mountain out of a mole hill… be happy that they are here to stay (just with tighter regulation)!!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,161 other followers